JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Maria Teresa Moreno Murillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia T-333/98.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó por improcedentes las peticiones presentadas por los accionantes de la referencia, toda vez que de acuerdo con lo establecido en del Decreto 2067 de 1991 -Art. 49- Contra las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. NEGAR por improcedentes las peticiones presentadas por Gustavo Alvarez Gardeazábal y Manuel Yesid Rojas González, de una parte, y Elizabeth Cristina Carvajal Romero, de otra.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.